Understanding the Output

Understanding the Output

Every contract scan produces a structured report. Here’s how to read it.


Output structure (always in this order)

Every scan follows the same structure. This consistency is intentional - it makes outputs easy to compare across contracts.

  1. ⚠️ Legal disclaimer
  2. 📋 Executive summary
  3. 📑 Contract metadata
  4. 🎯 Risk score and recommendation band
  5. 📊 Risk register
  6. ❌ Missing or ambiguous clauses
  7. ❓ Negotiation questions
  8. ✏️ Suggested redlines (Negotiation Prep mode only)
  9. 📧 Executive email draft (optional)
  10. 💾 Export artifacts

Every output starts with:

⚠️ Not legal advice. This analysis is for issue-spotting and review preparation only. Consult qualified legal counsel before signing.

This is non-negotiable. Contract Risk Scanner accelerates review; it does not replace legal counsel.


Section 2 - Executive summary

A 3–5 sentence overview answering:

  • What kind of contract is this?
  • What’s the overall risk posture?
  • What’s the top concern?
  • Should this be escalated?

Section 3 - Contract metadata

A table of key facts extracted from the contract:

Field Example
Contract Type SaaS MSA
Counterparty Acme Software Inc.
Effective Date 2026-01-15
Term Length 36 months
Renewal Type Auto-renew, 60-day notice
Governing Law Delaware
Total Contract Value $180,000

“Not specified” means the field was missing or unclear in the source document. The agent never guesses.


Section 4 - Risk score and recommendation band

A 0–100 score with a recommendation:

Score Band Recommendation
0–25 🟢 Low Safe to sign as-is
26–50 🟡 Moderate Negotiate flagged items
51–75 🟠 High Strongly recommend negotiation
76–100 🔴 Critical Escalate to legal

The score is always shown with its breakdown so you can see what drove it:

Score breakdown: Liability (+25), Missing indemnification (+15), Auto-renewal (+10), Vague SLA (+8) = 58 (High)

📖 Read more: Custom Risk Registers


Section 5 - Risk register

The core of the output. A table with one row per identified risk:

Column Meaning
Area Liability, IP, Data, Termination, Payment, SLA, etc.
Risk One-sentence description
Severity Low / Medium / High / Critical
Confidence Low / Medium / High - how confident the agent is in this finding
Evidence The contract quote (≤25 words) supporting this finding
Business Impact Financial, operational, or reputational impact in plain language
Recommendation Specific action to take

💡 Pay attention to Confidence. A “High severity / Low confidence” finding may be a false positive worth a second look.


Section 6 - Missing or ambiguous clauses

Clauses the agent’s risk rules expected but couldn’t find in the contract:

  • Missing: The clause is absent entirely
  • Ambiguous: The clause is present but unclear, conflicting, or insufficient

If you uploaded a custom risk register, missing clauses reflect your custom required clauses.


Section 7 - Negotiation questions

5–10 questions to ask the counterparty, ranked by importance:

  1. Can liability be capped at 12 months of fees?
  2. Will you commit to 72-hour security incident notification?
  3. What is your subprocessor list?

These are designed to be ready to send.


Section 8 - Suggested redlines (Negotiation Prep mode only)

For each high-severity item:

Current language:
"Vendor shall have unlimited liability..."

Proposed redline:
"The total liability of either party shall not exceed
the fees paid in the twelve (12) months preceding..."

Rationale:
Caps financial exposure at predictable level; standard in market.

Section 9 - Executive email draft (optional)

If you ask, the agent will draft a 4–6 sentence email summarizing risk for leadership.

“Draft an exec email for this scan”


Section 10 - Export artifacts

Every scan offers downloadable files. See Exporting Results.


Confidence levels explained

Confidence What it means
High Clear evidence in contract text matches a known risk pattern
Medium Likely a risk, but language is ambiguous or context-dependent
Low Possible risk, but worth human verification

Always treat Low-confidence findings as prompts for human review, not conclusions.


Severity vs. Confidence

These are independent:

  • High severity + High confidence = act on it
  • High severity + Low confidence = verify before acting
  • Low severity + High confidence = note for awareness
  • Low severity + Low confidence = often ignorable